The Israel Competitors Authority has summoned grocery store chain Shufersal Ltd. (TASE:SAE) and its former CEO Itzik Abercohen and different former managers to a listening to earlier than being filed with an indictment.
In line with the indictment Shufersal and Abercohen allegedly made public statements via which he tried to achieve preparations to lift costs. The previous Shufersal managers and the corporate are suspected of violating the Meals Legislation by interfering with the provider Berman within the shopper costs of different advertising chains.
The choice to file an indictment topic to a listening to was made as a part of the investigation into the meals market that started in 2021 by the Investigations Division of the Competitors Authority following public statements, in addition to suspected violations of the Meals Legislation.
In line with the indictment, Abercohen conveyed a message to suppliers and retailers, via public statements within the media in October 2021, about Shufersal’s need to lift costs, with the intention of main to cost will increase within the meals business by suppliers and retailers.
In his statements, which have been revealed in “Ma’ariv”, on the Ynet web site and in “Yediot Ahronoth,” Abercohen stated, amongst different issues, “A wave of value will increase is inevitable” and “The quantity of the value enhance will vary between 3% and seven%”, and “I’ve not but been contacted by any massive producer, since everyone seems to be making an effort to keep away from value will increase, however I consider that within the coming weeks the contacts will come.” It’s alleged that Abercohen expressed himself on this means, whereas being conscious of the impression of his statements in the marketplace.
In line with the second suspicion within the indictment, managers at Shufersal agreed with officers at Berman, which provides the chain with bread and baked items, to extend shopper costs for Berman merchandise at Shufersal, and as a part of this, they demanded that Berman workers deal with the buyer costs charged by different retailers for its merchandise, in any other case the buyer costs for Berman merchandise at Shufersal would return to their earlier ranges. This allegedly violates Part 6 of the Meals Legislation, which prohibits a retailer from interfering with a provider relating to the buyer value that one other retailer costs for a commodity.
Abercohen’s attorneys Advs. Ofer Tzur and Avner Finkelshtein of Gornitzky stated, “Mr. Abercohen wish to clarify that he categorically rejects the allegations attributed to him. Mr. Abercohen served as CEO of Shufersal for a few years and led the corporate whereas strictly adhering to the provisions of the legislation, the ideas of free competitors and accountability in direction of the buyer public. All through his tenure, Mr. Abercohen acted with a deep dedication to transparency, correct administration and adherence to the binding regulatory guidelines.
RELATED ARTICLES
“The final statements quoted within the letter of suspicion (for the needs of the listening to), relating to the potential chance of a value will increase, have been made by him orally in response to questions at a single public press convention in 2021. These are just a few statements relating to world tendencies and a authentic interpretation of world financial processes of rising commodity costs and their potential impression on the native market, whereas offering a substantive response to journalists’ questions.
“There was nothing in these common statements that might set up a suspicion of improper motion or a need to lift costs. The straightforward truth is that in observe Shufersal didn’t intend to lift costs, however somewhat took steps to forestall will increase, fought to forestall costs from rising, and in any case didn’t increase costs throughout that interval. This speaks for itself.
“Mr. Abercohen didn’t provoke or participate in any association that might hurt competitors or customers, and he’s clearly and unequivocally sure that there was no flaw in his conduct. It’s to be assumed that the Competitors Authority may also perceive this after a full and complete evaluation of the proof and listening to the arguments on the listening to.”
Presumption of innocence: Shufersal and the previous managers haven’t been convicted and have the appropriate to be presumed harmless
Printed by Globes, Israel enterprise information – en.globes.co.il – on April 22, 2025.
© Copyright of Globes Writer Itonut (1983) Ltd., 2025.
